Economic Development - Human Development Index (HDI)
Introduction to the HDI
- The Human Development Index is published by the UNDP and focuses on longevity, basic education and minimal income. It tracks progress made by countries in improving these three outcomes.
- The inclusion of education and health indicators is a sign of successful government policies in providing access to important merit goods such as health care, sanitation and education.
- Knowledge: First an educational component made up of two statistics – mean years of schooling and expected years of schooling
- Long and healthy life: Second a life expectancy component is calculated using a minimum value for life expectancy of 25 years and maximum value of 85 years.
- A decent standard of living: The final element is gross national income (GNI) per capita adjusted to purchasing power parity standard (PPP).
The UNDP classifies each country into one of three development bins:
- Low human development for HDI scores between 0.0 and 0.5,
- Medium human development for HDI scores between 0.5 and 0.8
- High human development for HDI scores between 0.8 and 1.0.
Important note:
GNI is now used rather than GDP because of the growing size of remittances in the global economy and also the importance of international aid payments. For example, because of remittances from abroad, GNI in the Philippines greatly exceeds GDP
Log of income is used in the HDI calculation because income is instrumental to human development but higher incomes are assumed to have a declining contribution to human development
GNI is now used rather than GDP because of the growing size of remittances in the global economy and also the importance of international aid payments. For example, because of remittances from abroad, GNI in the Philippines greatly exceeds GDP
Log of income is used in the HDI calculation because income is instrumental to human development but higher incomes are assumed to have a declining contribution to human development
Global Human Development Map for 2011
GNI per Capita - Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
This is a method of currency valuation based on the idea that two identical goods in different countries should eventually cost the same. This is illustrated by the Big Mac index, which takes a Big Mac hamburger and compares its prices in different countries in order to establish the relative value of their currencies. If PPP holds true, then you can buy the same goods and services with £100 in London as you can in Glasgow, New York and Cape Town. There are many reasons why this will not be the case!
Human Development Index for 2010
A selection of data drawn from the Human Development Index is provided in the table below.
Country | GNI per capita (2008 US$PPP) | HDI value | Inequality-adjusted HDI value (IHDI) | Life expectancy at birth (years) | Mean years of schooling (of adults) (years) |
Norway |
58,809
|
0.938
|
0.876
|
81.0
|
12.6
|
Australia |
38,691
|
0.937
|
0.864
|
81.9
|
12.0
|
United States |
47,093
|
0.902
|
0.799
|
79.6
|
12.4
|
Ireland |
33,077
|
0.895
|
0.813
|
80.3
|
11.6
|
Canada |
38,668
|
0.888
|
0.812
|
81.0
|
11.5
|
Sweden |
36,936
|
0.885
|
0.824
|
81.3
|
11.6
|
Germany |
35,308
|
0.885
|
0.814
|
80.2
|
12.2
|
Japan |
34,692
|
0.884
|
Not available
|
83.2
|
11.5
|
Korea (Republic of) |
29,517
|
0.877
|
0.731
|
79.8
|
11.6
|
France |
34,340
|
0.872
|
0.792
|
81.6
|
10.4
|
Spain |
29,661
|
0.863
|
0.779
|
81.3
|
10.4
|
Greece |
27,580
|
0.855
|
0.768
|
79.7
|
10.5
|
Italy |
29,619
|
0.854
|
0.752
|
81.4
|
9.7
|
United Kingdom |
35,087
|
0.849
|
0.766
|
79.8
|
9.5
|
Hungary |
17,472
|
0.805
|
0.736
|
73.9
|
11.7
|
Poland |
17,803
|
0.795
|
0.709
|
76.0
|
10.0
|
Chile |
13,561
|
0.783
|
0.634
|
78.8
|
9.7
|
Mexico |
13,971
|
0.750
|
0.593
|
76.7
|
8.7
|
Russian Federation |
15,258
|
0.719
|
0.636
|
67.2
|
8.8
|
Brazil |
10,607
|
0.699
|
0.509
|
72.9
|
7.2
|
China |
7,258
|
0.663
|
0.511
|
73.5
|
7.5
|
Sri Lanka |
4,886
|
0.658
|
0.546
|
74.4
|
8.2
|
Thailand |
8,000
|
0.654
|
0.516
|
69.3
|
6.6
|
South Africa |
9,812
|
0.597
|
0.411
|
52.0
|
8.2
|
India |
3,337
|
0.519
|
0.365
|
64.4
|
4.4
|
Kenya |
1,627
|
0.470
|
0.320
|
55.6
|
7.0
|
Bangladesh |
1,587
|
0.469
|
0.331
|
66.9
|
4.8
|
Nigeria |
2,156
|
0.423
|
0.246
|
48.4
|
5.0
|
Côte d'Ivoire |
1,624
|
0.397
|
0.254
|
58.4
|
3.3
|
Ethiopia |
992
|
0.328
|
0.216
|
56.1
|
1.5
|
Sierra Leone |
808
|
0.317
|
0.193
|
48.2
|
2.9
|
Niger |
675
|
0.261
|
0.173
|
52.5
|
1.4
|
Zimbabwe |
176
|
0.140
|
0.098
|
47.0
|
7.2
|
Note: IHDI: Inequality-adjusted HDI (a new measure introduced into 2010 Human Development Report)
Uneven progress but deep inequalities
- The world average HDI rose to 0.68 in 2010 from 0.57 in 1990, continuing the upward trend from 1970, when it stood at 0.48
- The fastest progress has been in East Asia & the Pacific, followed by South Asia and Arab States.
- All but 3 of the 135 countries have a higher level of human development today than in 1970
- The exceptions are the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zambia and Zimbabwe
- From 1970 to 2010 real per capita income in developed countries increased 2.3 percent a year on average, compared with 1.5 percent for developing countries
- The real average income of people in 13 countries in the bottom quarter of today’s world income distribution is lower than in 1970
Limitations of the Human Development Index
The HDI notably fails to take account of qualitative factors, such as cultural identity and political freedoms (human security, gender opportunities and human rights for example).
Many argue that the HDI should become more human-centred and expanded to include more dimensions, ranging from gender equity to environmental biodiversity
The GNP per capita figure – and consequently the HDI figure – takes no account of income distribution. If income is unevenly distributed, then GNP per capita will be an inaccurate measure of the monetary well-being of the people. Inequitable development is not human development.
PPP values change very quickly and are likely to be inaccurate or misleading
The 2010 edition of the Human Development Report marked the launch of a new Inequality-adjusted HDIand also a Gender Inequality Index and a Multidimensional Poverty Index
Inequality HDI - The average loss in the HDI due to inequality is about 23 percent—that is, adjusted for inequality, the global HDI of 0.682 in 2011 would fall to 0.525.
Key point: the HDI is intended to allow economists to draw broad conclusions about which countries enjoyrelatively high standards of living, and which are, by comparison, under-developed.
TESTIMONY ON HOW I GOT MY LOAN AMOUNT FROM A RELIABLE AND TRUSTED LOAN COMPANY LAST WEEK. Email for immediate response drbenjaminfinance@gmail.com
ReplyDeleteHello everyone, My name is Mrs. Carolin Glowski, I'm from Europe, am here to testify of how i got my loan from BENJAMIN LOAN FINANCE after i applied Two times from various loan lenders who claimed to be lenders right here this forum, i thought their lending where real and i applied but they never gave me loan until a friend of mine introduce me to {Dr. Benjamin Scarlet Owen} the C.E.O of BENJAMIN LOAN FINANCE who promised to help me with a loan of my desire and he really did as he promised without any form of delay, I never thought there are still reliable loan lenders until i met {Dr. Benjamin Scarlet Owen} who really helped me with my loan and changed my life for the better. I don't know if you are in need of an urgent loan also, So feel free to contact Dr. Benjamin Scarlet Owen on his email address drbenjaminfinance@gmail.com