Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Aggregate Demand
Aggregate Demand
Introduction
Aggregate means ‘total’ and in this case we use the term to measure how much is being spent by all consumers, businesses, the government and people and firms overseas.
Aggregate demand (AD) = total spending on goods and services
AD = C + I + G + (X-M)
- C: Consumers' expenditure on goods and services : Also known as consumption, this includes demand for durables e.g. audio-visual equipment and motor vehicles & non-durable goods such as food and drinks which are “consumed” and must be re-purchased.
- I: Capital Investment – This is spending on capital goods such as plant and equipment and buildings to produce more consumer goods in the future. Investment also includes spending on working capital such as stocks of finished and semi-finished goods.
- Capital investment spending in the UK accounts for between 16-20% of GDP in any given year. Of this investment, 75% comes from private sector businesses such as Tesco, British Airways and British Petroleum and the remainder is spent by the government – for example building new schools or in improving railway or road networks. So a mobile phone company such as O2 spending £100 million on extending its network capacity and the government allocating £15 million of funds to build a new hospital are both capital investment. Investment has important effects on the supply-side as well as being an important component of AD. A small part of investment spending is the change in the value of stocks –i.e. unsold products. Producers may find either than demand is running higher than output (i.e. stocks will fall) or that demand is weaker than expected and less than current output (in which case the value of unsold stocks will rise.)
- G: Government Spending – This is spending on state-provided goods and services including public goods and merit goods . Decisions on how much the government will spend each year are affected by developments in the economy and the political priorities of the government.
- Government spending on goods and services is around 18-20% of GDP but this tends to understate the true size of the government sector in the economy. Firstly some spending is on investment and a sizeable slice goes on welfare state payments. Transfer payments in the form of benefits (e.g. state pensions and the job-seekers allowance) are not included in current government spending because they are a transfer from one group (i.e. people in work paying income taxes) to another (i.e. pensioners drawing their state pension having retired from the labour force, or families on low incomes).
- X: Exports of goods and services - Exports sold overseas are an inflow of demand (an injection) into our circular flow of income and spending adding to aggregate demand.
- M: Imports of goods and services. Imports are a withdrawal of demand (a leakage) from the circular flow of income and spending.
- Net exports measure the value of exports minus the value of imports. When net exports are positive, there is a trade surplus (adding to AD); when net exports are negative, there is a trade deficit (reducing AD). The UK has been running a large trade deficit for several years now.
Aggregate Demand in the UK Economy
All of the data above is expressed in £ billion at constant prices
Source: Office for National Statistics, Economic Trends 2011
The main components of aggregate demand are shown in the table above
Remember that
AD = C + I + G + X – M
Remember that
AD = C + I + G + X – M
The change in the value of stocks is a small component of the equation, it relates to changes in how much investment businesses are making in stocks (unsold products) to be consumed at a later stage.
- Recession: 2009 was a year of recession – what happened to each of the components of aggregate demand in 2009 compared to 2008?
- Recovery: The British economy started to recover in 2010; using the table can you explain why this happened?
Shocks to aggregate demand
- Many unexpected events can happen which causes changes in the level of demand, output and employment
- Headwinds can alter direction with great speed leading to uncertainty about where the economy is heading
- These events are called “shocks”. Some of the causes of AD shocks are as follows:
- A big rise or fall in the exchange rate – affecting export demand and having follow-on effects on output, employment, incomes and profits of businesses linked to export industries.
- A recession in one or more of our main trading partners which affects demand for our exports of goods and services.
- A slump in the housing market or a big change in share prices.
- An event such as the credit crunch (global financial crisis) – involving a fall in the amount of credit available for borrowing by households and businesses.
- An unexpected cut or an unexpected rise in interest rates or change in government taxation and spending – for example the shock of deep cuts in state spending expected in 2011 and beyond.
These shocks will bring about a shift in the aggregate demand curve – and we turn to this next.
The Aggregate Demand Curve
The AD curve shows the relationship between the general price level and real GDP.
Aggregate Demand and the Price Level
There are several explanations for an inverse relationship between AD and the price level in an economy. These are summarised below:
- Falling real incomes: As the price level rises, so the real value of people’s incomes fall and consumers are less able to buy the items they want or need. If over the course of a year all prices rose by 10 per cent whilst your money income remained the same, your real income would have fallen by 10%
- The balance of trade: A persistent rise in the price of level of Country X could make foreign-produced goods and services cheaper in price terms, causing a fall in exports and a rise in imports. This will lead to a reduction in net trade and a contraction in AD
- Interest rate effect: if the price level rises, this causes inflation and an increase in the demand for money and a consequential rise in interest rates with a deflationary effect on the economy. This assumes that the central bank (in our case the Bank of England) is setting interest rates in order to meet a specified inflation target
Shifts in the AD Curve
- A change in the factors affecting any one or more components of aggregate demand i.e. households (C), firms (I), the government (G) or overseas consumers and business (X) changes planned spending and results in a shift in the AD curve.
Consider the diagram below which shows an inward shift of AD from AD1 to AD3 and an outward shift of AD from AD1 to AD2. The increase in AD might have been caused for example by a fall in interest rates or an increase in consumers’ wealth because of rising house prices.
Factors causing a shift in AD | |
Changes in Expectations Current spending is affected by anticipated income and inflation | The expectations of consumers and businesses have a powerful effect on spending When confidence falls, we see an increase in saving and businesses postpone investment projects because of worries over weak demand and lower expected profits. |
Changes in Monetary Policy – i.e. a change ininterest rates | If interest rates fall – this lowers the cost of borrowing and the incentive to save, encouraging consumption. Lower interest rates encourage firms to borrow and invest There are time lags between changes in interest rates and the changes in aggregate demand. |
Changes in Fiscal Policy Fiscal Policy refers to changes in government spending, welfare benefits and taxation, and the amount that the government borrows | The Government may increase its expenditure e.g. financed by a higherbudget deficit - this directly increases AD Income tax affects disposable income e.g. lower rates of income tax raise disposable income and should boost consumption. An increase in transfer payments increases AD – particularly if welfare recipients spend a high % of the benefits they receive. |
Economic events in the international economy International factors such as the exchange rate and foreign income (e.g. the economic cycle in other countries) | A fall in the value of the pound (£) (a depreciation) makes imports dearer and exports cheaper - the net result should be that UK AD rises The impact depends on the price elasticity of demand for imports and exports and also the elasticity of supply of UK exporters in response to exchange rate depreciation. An increase in overseas incomes raises demand for exports. In contrast arecession in a major export market will lead to a fall in exports and an inward shift of aggregate demand. |
Changes in household wealth Wealth is the value of assets owned e.g. houses and shares | A fall in the value of share prices or a slump in the housing market can lead to a decline in household financial wealth and a fall in consumer demand Declining asset prices also have a negative effect on consumer confidence / a fall in expectations |
Changes in the supply of credit | The availability of credit is vital for the smooth functioning of most modern economies We have seen in recent years how the bursting of the credit bubble in countries such as the UK and the USA has created many problems for businesses and individuals Many banks and other lenders are now more reluctant to lend Interest rates on different loans have become more expensive Instead of taking out new loans, in recent times businesses have been paying back debt. In the 5 years before the financial crisis UK companies borrowed £107m from banks every day. Since then they've been repaying £5.8m a day |
Poverty & Inequality in Resource Allocation
Poverty & Inequality in Resource Allocation
Poverty and Inequality in Resource Allocation
Going without
“In the UK people can become poor as a result of social and economic processes, such as unemployment and changing family structures.
Poverty is not simply about being on a low income and going without – it is also to do with being denied hood health, education, good housing and social activities, as well as basic self-esteem”
Source: Child Poverty Action Group
In a market economy an individual’s ability to consume goods & services depends upon his/her income or other resources such as savings
An unequal distribution of income and wealth may result in an unsatisfactory allocation of resourcesand can also lead to alienation and encourage crime with negative consequences for the rest of society
The free-market system will not always respond to the needs and wants of people with insufficient economic votes to have any impact on market demand. What matters in a market based system is youreffective demand for goods and services.
When we are discussing inequality and poverty, we cannot escape making value judgements i.e. normative views about what is an acceptable scale of inequality and what is not
Absolute poverty
Absolute poverty measures the number of people living below a certain income threshold or the number of households unable to afford certain basic goods and servicesWhat we choose to include in a basic acceptable standard of living is naturally open to discussion.
Relative poverty
Relative poverty measures the extent to which a household’s financial resources falls below an average income level.Although living standards and real incomes have grown because of higher employment and sustained growth, Britain has become a more unequal society over the last 30 years
Poorer families have a lower life expectancy
People from poorer backgrounds are unhealthier and die earlier than the rich, according a study measuring the link between health and wealth. Poorer people in their fifties were 10 times more likely to die earlier than those who are richer, according to a report from the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS). The poor often have to stop work early due to ill health, the group added and this increases the risk of these groups suffering income poverty during their retirement years.
Source: BBC news and Institute for Fiscal Studies
Source: BBC news and Institute for Fiscal Studies
The most commonly used threshold of low income in Britain is 60% of median household income after deducting housing costs.
The distribution of income in the UK
In 2008/09, income before taxes and benefits of the top fifth of households in the UK was £73,800 per year on average compared with £5,000 for the bottom fifth, a ratio of 15 to one.After taking account of taxes and benefits, the gap between the top and the bottom fifth was reduced with average income of £53,900 per year and £13,600, respectively, a ratio of four to one. This shows that the tax and benefits system works in a progressive way to reduce the scale of income inequality.
In the UK, the share of total income earned by the top 1% income earners rose from 6% in 1975 to 14% in 2005
The gap between lowest and higher income groups can be seen in this chart:
Another way of showing this income data is in the table below – this shows the distribution of disposable income by household income quintile. The data is for 2008-09.
Bottom Fifth
|
Next Fifth
|
Middle Fifth
|
Next Fifth
|
Top Fifth
| |
% share of disposable income
|
7
|
12
|
16
|
22
|
42
|
The Poverty Trap
The poverty trap affects people living in households on low incomes.It creates a disincentive either to look for work or work longer hours because of the effects of the income tax and welfare benefits system.
For example, a worker might be given the opportunity to earn an extra £60 a week by working ten additional hours. This boost to his/her gross income is reduced by an increase in income tax and national insurance contributions.
The individual may lose some income-related welfare benefits and the combined effects of this might be to take away over 70% of a rise in income, leaving little in the way of extra net or disposable income.
When one adds in the possible extra costs of more expensive transport charges and the costs of arranging child care, then the disincentive to work may be quite strong.
Wealth inequality in the world
Credit Suisse estimates that there are 24.5 million dollar millionaires, or adults with net assets, including housing, of more than $1 million in the world today. This group equates to 0.5% of the world's adult population and owns 36% of the world's private wealth. By contrast the bottom 50% of the world's adult population owns less than 2% of world's private wealth
Government Policies to Reduce Poverty
- Cost
- Effectiveness
- Impact on others in the economy
A switch towards greater means-tested benefits: Means testing allows welfare benefits to go to those people and families in greatest need. A means-test involves a check on the financial circumstances of the benefit claimant before paying any benefit out. This would help the welfare system to target helpfor those households on the lowest incomes. However means tested benefits are often unpopular with the recipients.
Linking the state retirement pension to average earnings rather than prices: This policy would help to relieve relative poverty among low-income pensioner households. Their pension would rise in line with the growth of average earnings each year
Special employment measures (including New Deal): Government employment schemes seek to raise employment levels and improve the employment prospects of the long-term unemployed.
Increased spending on education and training: Unemployment is a cause of poverty and structural unemployment makes the problem worse. There are millions of households in the UK where no one in the family is in any kind of work and this increases the risk of poverty.
The National Minimum Wage: The National Minimum Wage (NMW) was introduced in April 1999 - employers cannot legally undercut the NMW. Since 1999, the beneficial impact of the minimum wage has been concentrated on the lowest paid workers in service sector jobs where there is little or no trade union protection.
Monday, September 15, 2014
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)